It was so intense, I don't think I can keep my eyes open long enough to blog about it. Anyways, Edmundson's article was about his own experiences as a professor at the University of Virginia. His students would evaluate him as being an interesting professor but Edmundson himself did not like his self image that came from the responses.
Edmundson's article is now widely anthologized and taught in English departments, not necessarily because it is correct but because of the responses it elicits from students. Edmundson argues that the liberal education of the university has been marred by the expectations of consumer students: Edmundson contends that universities now compete for student money, causing admissions departments to become more like marketing departments and institutions to concentrate on amenities and activities over a quality education.
He points to teacher assessments, new gyms, multi-million dollar student centers and glossy university advertisements as evidence for this argument In the end, he sees this change catering to a "culture of cool" where genius is counter to the academic norm and most students are "sleepwalking" 46 and frustratingly inoffensive As he puts it, "[U]niversity culture, like American culture writ large, is … ever more devoted to consumption and entertainment, to the using and using up of goods and images.
For someone growing up in America now, there are few available alternatives to the cool consumer worldview" My students go crazy for Edmundson, and a quick search for Edmundson responses will reveal students from all over America responding to his argument with fervor for required class blogs.
Edmundson issues such a strong response because he specifically indicts student interests and lifestyles: I am quick not to endorse Edmunson in my own class.
Raising your personal issues with Edmundson is key to a productive classroom debate on the issue; otherwise, students may see you siding with Edmundson simply because you too are a college teacher.
And granted, Edmundson is a little outdated. He wrote the article inand even a cave dweller could list a slew of variables affecting education since then: I generally have students address the changing face of education in their response to Edmundson, but no such intervention is needed.
Plus, no matter how much they disagree with Edmundson, evidence of his argument can be seen all over their campuses; it is also difficult for anyone to argue that consumerism has not invaded the university to some degree.On the Uses of Liberal Education By: Mark Edmundson Outline Audience Author's Purpose To prove that colleges are becoming too commercially based.
Pages Uses of a Liberal Education" and Mark Edmundson to Essay supplemental lmu mark edmundsons on the uses of essay assignments for novels liberal education but. pages) taking a Rogerian approach to developing an argument in response to Mark Edmundson’s essay “On.
Feb 09, · Edmundson's essay, "On the Uses of a Liberal Education", was very intimidating. It gave me, a student, insight to how my professors feel about their classes, the university, their students, and the atmosphere of colleges today.
The two articles for today On the Uses of Liberal Education: As Lite Entertainment for Bored College Students” by Mark Edmundson and “On the Uses of Liberal Education: As a Weapon in the Hands of the Restless Poor” by Earl Shorris focus on students.
Each though has a completely different argument about how students approach college education. Critical Response #1 On the Uses of a Liberal Education: As Lite entertainment for the Bored College Students Mark Edmundson is an English professor at the University of .
Mark Edmundson's essay, "The Uses of a Liberal Education", provides many interesting and valid points on why the liberal arts field is becoming devalued in the education system.
According to Edmundson, the origin of devaluation in the liberal art's program can be traced to consumerism.